Is Michigan State Not Spending Enough on Football?

NCAAF College Football News, Photos, Stats, Scores, Schedule & Videos...

Per an outstanding, insightful report published Tuesday by The Athletic, Michigan State ranks 11th of 18 Big Ten schools in estimated money allocated to its football roster.

That kind of information is extremely hard to come by. Before we get into what it means for the Spartans, a quick shoutout to the entire staff at The Athletic. Without that reporting, most of us would still be guessing.

Now, to East Lansing.

After Michigan State landed a historic $401 million commitment last December — $290 million of it earmarked for athletics — a lot of fans assumed the football program would immediately spend like a top-tier Big Ten team. The same expectation followed the MSUFCU jersey-patch deal. Both are real resources. Both are also being spread across the department, facilities, and a multi-year rebuild, not dumped into one roster cycle.

The Athletic’s estimates put Big Ten football roster spending in a conference-wide band of roughly $27 million to $31 million. Ohio State and Oregon sit in a tier of their own, paying nearly double that average. USC, Indiana, and Michigan come in third through fifth — over the average, but not in the same stratosphere as the two leaders. Nebraska and Penn State take sixth and seventh, barely clearing the conference midpoint. Wisconsin and UCLA land right around it.

Then come the programs under the average. Four of them sit in a tight cluster: Maryland, Michigan State, Northwestern, and Washington.

The estimated Big Ten order, as reported:

  1. Ohio State
  2. Oregon
  3. USC
  4. Indiana
  5. Michigan
  6. Nebraska
  7. Penn State
  8. Wisconsin
  9. UCLA
  10. Maryland
  11. Michigan State
  12. Northwestern
  13. Washington
  14. Rutgers
  15. Illinois
  16. Minnesota
  17. Iowa
  18. Purdue

It’s easy to see where a chunk of Michigan State’s money went: stabilizing the offensive line, landing Cam Edwards, and adding cornerback help along with Kenny Soares and Eli Coenen. The Spartans are not refusing to spend. They are showing some conservatism while they rebuild the foundation.

That context matters. Almost the entire staff turned over after last season. More than half the roster did, too. New head coach Pat Fitzgerald is still establishing the program after a 1-8 Big Ten year in which high-end recruits were largely looking elsewhere. There is little reason to overspend on a handful of players in an 11-man game when the first job is culture, scheme, and depth.

What is wild is the gap itself. The leaders of the Big Ten are paying something like 2.5 to 3 times what the lowest-spending programs are putting on the field. That is going to keep raising the same questions fans have asked for years: Is a salary cap coming? How will the NCAA, or anyone else, actually regulate this money? Those questions only get louder now that one of college football’s most closely guarded secrets is finally in public view.

There is a reason The Athletic’s project is being read and argued over. Schools have spent years declining to make this spending public. Seeing the ranges in one place changes the conversation.

So the question for Spartan fans is not just “Why 11th?” It’s whether this is a temporary holding pattern while Fitzgerald builds the program — or the new normal in a conference that is splitting into spenders and everyone else. Do you think the next step is conference-level salary caps?

More at NCAAF College Football News, Photos, Stats, Scores, Schedule & Videos