Nick Saban faces backlash after defending Protect College Sports Act

Nick Saban faces backlash after defending Protect College Sports Act

NCAAF College Football News, Photos, Stats, Scores, Schedule & Videos...

Nick Saban faces backlash after defending Protect College Sports Act

Nick Saban faces backlash after defending Protect College Sports Act originally appeared on The Sporting News.
Add The Sporting News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Former Alabama Crimson Tide head coach Nick Saban appeared on ESPN's First Take and had a strong defense for the Protect College Sports Act. His response is what he has been preaching since he said goodbye to the game.

The Protect College Sports Act (PCSA) is an act to increase student athlete compensation while also protecting women’s and Olympic sports, ensuring academic support, and regulating agents. It overwhelmingly passed in the Senate with a 77-22 vote.

The Act would allow for additional compensation to flow to athletes through a new $22.5 million retention fund, which can grow to $27.5 million for schools paying athletes in non-revenue sports. That could grow the revenue sharing cap for each institution from $21.3 million currently to $48.8 million annually. 

Players would be allowed only one transfer without penalty, set a five-year age-based eligibility, and allow exceptions for coaching changes, expulsion from a sport, or misconduct. Agent fees would be capped at 5%, and FBS coaches will not be allowed to leave for a new head coaching job in-season.

Saban retired from coaching in 2024. Since then, he has voiced his opinion on players getting paid and NIL. On Tuesday morning, he went on give his take on the proposal to "save" college sports.

"These things are totally different markets. That's like asking me, does a student's scholarship equal a professor's pay? I mean, how much value does a coach create for a university," Saban said. He finished off by reassuring them that coaches' markets are different than players' markets and to worry about that rather than how much someone is being paid.

Saban has a point; coaches do add value to a university, but no one at home is tuning into a college football game because they want to see the coach. They want to see the players on the field. People do not want to buy a jersey with a coach's last name on it.

The main issue isn't whether coaches or players are in a different market. Rather, that's why there shouldn't be a better way to protect the money an athlete makes and hold universities accountable if they owe a student-athlete money.

For years, universities have sold jerseys with athletes'' names on the back, brought in money from TV deals and commercials and were not required to share a dime with the people responsible for raking in the coins. Now things have changed. Why is this even an issue?

Every Saturday, these student athletes put their lives on the line for our entertainment, and it happens to make their universities filthy rich. If the athletes aren't being paid with this money, where does it go? 

That's another question for another day. 

MORE COLLEGE FOOTBALL NEWS:

More at NCAAF College Football News, Photos, Stats, Scores, Schedule & Videos